Skip to main content

Preliminary Video Evaluation

Image
By

Pre-production.


My video featured two characters engaging in conversation over a table, after a first body entered through a door. This was not the original plan, as time and access to actors and locations posed the first of many threats to the piece.
The 180 degree rule was established early in the piece by aiming to strictly only film the male character from front. He would be placed in front of a building, so it would be relatively simple and straight-forward to execute. Match on action was filmed from a variety of angles in order to show facial expression as well as maintain a natural and fluid notion of movement.

Production.

Execution of the production itself was generally smooth and uncomplicated as shots were already laid out in the specifically designed storyboard. This made production easier as plans were already laid out, all that needed to be done was a follow up via the means of the camera. Direction of the actors was relatively controllable as the circumstances of the production were minimal in regards to theatrical ability and maturity levels. 


Post-production.

Editing in post-production proved complex as I had failed to allow myself 'cutting space' either sides of the clips, making finding the exact position at which to cut a scene difficult. This is entirely critical of my own ability as a director. Another flaw noticed in post-production was the collapse and dissolved movement of the rules of degree at times, as one actress had her back against a wall, making over-the-shoulder shots virtually impossible, something that now, looks awful.  

Comments

  1. Ben Escott9 April 2017 at 13:58

    Ahh there we go that's a little more evaluative. I think there was lots that went well and you shouldn't forget that. It's ok to be critical of yourself in a healthy way. The whole point of doing the prelim is to make mistakes and learn from them. You can be sure that someone like me will be ready to point out anything you got wrong because sniping from the sidelines is what I do best.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evaluation Seven: Progression

By
Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to full product? Planning. My preliminary task was painfully unplanned, and it was blatantly obvious. I'm a perfectionist, and it killed me to submit that video under my name. But my poor time management forced it through and I have no-one but myself to blame.  Besides learning to understand the importance of time management and how extensive planning aids projects significantly; I learnt a number of cinematic skills in progression from my preliminary- how to reduce white noise and background sound, how to enhance lighting features, how to follow the 180 degree rule accurately. I.e. not placing my character directly against the wall so it becomes virtually impossible to carry out an over the shoulder shot. Exhibit A:  But rather allowing plenty of access to the characters blind spots to get the best angles for different shots and therefore different meanings and impacts...
Post a Comment
Read more

Evaluation-Marking

By
1) Well written. Some good points about conventions. Good on introduction of character. Not sure about mix of shot types point 2) Good stuff on the white male  and demonisation of mental illness. Women as victims? 3) ' freedom with the control of the films running' I think this is a good point but it needed a little more explanation 4 ' cultural capital of audiences'??? Again a good point I think but you've over-complicated. 5) Some evidence of an understanding of marketing but more explanation would have been better. 6) Fairly basic points but covered all 7) A good post made much better with the addition of a director's commentary. The binary opposites of your two pieces...weirdo. Level 3 12–15 marks  • Proficient skill in the use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.  • Proficient understanding of issues around audience, institution, technology, representation, forms and conventions in relation to production.  • Proficient ability to refer...
Post a Comment
Read more

Research and Planning- Marking

By
Kate's mood board work was not exactly what I had in mind yet still showed remarkable insight on occasions. The still images were used as the starting point of several analytical pieces which could be excellent (the pier) but over-complicated in places too (her comments on neon lighting in Drive). Kate's post on title sequences seems to chart the evolution of her idea rather than demonstrating a knowledge of the variety of title sequences and an understanding of their effects. Her entry on David Fincher is frustrating in that, although some truly insightful points are made, they are often buried amongst points that lack any relevance or don't make sense. The fourth slide of Kate's American Psycho analysis is an example of a good point almost lost due to over-complication. Kate's post on year 13 advice demonstrated a thorough approach to preparation for this task and her youtube clip on experiments with lighting demonstrate an incredible dedication and attention ...
Post a Comment
Read more