Skip to main content

David Fincher and the title sequence.



Of all of David Fincher's films, and their respective title sequences, 2002s 'Panic Room' will always hold a firm position in my list of favourites. The first Fincher film I ever saw, Panic Room's title sequence is visually totally unrelated to the context of the film, yet subconsciously, so connected- its absence would destroy the films enigmatic nature almost instantly. The 'North by Northwest' feel is demonstrated through a use of perfectly aligned typography, classically silver against the cold grey of the city landscape, indicating the icy nature of the films subjects. The music is typical of Fincher, one way or another, it's classic- in reference to Panic Room, it is quite literally classical, however, the term 'classic' is used loosely, as with Fincher, it can mean anything from iconic hit, to legendary anthem. Anyway, the classical music used in the title sequence of Panic Room act well alongside the serif font used to portray the credits as they are symbolic of the films 'victims', the characters that need to seek refuge in the 'panic room'. The timer ticking along with the credits, which sometimes move in a panning or slight zoom motion, symbolise the almost 'cat and mouse' type theme within the film itself, and it soon sets itself in the audience's mind that the credits are the victims, being hunted by the city. (Far-fetched albeit, this is my genuine interpretation.)

Se7en is a visual goldmine of criminal iconography. As an audience we are thrown headfirst into the perspective of the killer. We are shown images that make us uncomfortable- forcing us to live in his sick and twisted fantasy of torture and pain. However, the use of close ups and attention to detail have an almost hypnotic effect. We are appalled by what we see yet unable to turn away. The childlike handwriting feel of the font and the displaying the credits on a glitching black screen unnerves the viewer- whoever has written this is clearly not a child and the glitches give us a feeling of sudden changes of mood. My interpretation, from a sociological perspective, is that John Doe, our killer, played by Kevin Spacey, obviously exists for gratification of entertainment, but in my opinion, I feel it would not be impossible that Fincher invented him to raise a deeper philosophical question. Again, referencing the font choices to present the credits. In Western media, it is a growing norm and cultural convention that deranged killers can often be excused in newspaper headlines by being explained to be 'well-liked child' or 'sweet young man'. This is relevant when exploring the child-like handwriting used to express the credits, as it embodies the nature of Western media, excusing ill-nature with excuses of unavoidable mental illness, which of course I stand for, the mentally ill should receive help and rehabilitation. However, in the context of Se7en, this is especially relevant as the closure of the film quite literally asks for forgiveness. As an audience, our initial interpretation of Doe has connections to troubled childhood, unconsciously causing us to sympathise with him as a helpless human 'child'. With this stance on him, can we forgive him so easily?


Fight Club and The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo are intensely similar, loud, aggressive, violent, digitally constructed, perfectly executed. Fight Club takes us on a journey through the lead characters electrical synapses in his mind, out through his head, and along the barrel of the gun that is firmly lodged into his mouth. This establishes the first concept, psychology. Nervous systems and synapses aren't meant to be pretty, but the character in question has a particularly hideous one, and the journey through it is hectic, interrupted constantly by sharp stabs of unique and bold font, in an obnoxiously neon colour. His mental state of mind is damaged, something which is loud and proud from the beginning, but only relevant at the end.























Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evaluation Seven: Progression

Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to full product? Planning. My preliminary task was painfully unplanned, and it was blatantly obvious. I'm a perfectionist, and it killed me to submit that video under my name. But my poor time management forced it through and I have no-one but myself to blame.  Besides learning to understand the importance of time management and how extensive planning aids projects significantly; I learnt a number of cinematic skills in progression from my preliminary- how to reduce white noise and background sound, how to enhance lighting features, how to follow the 180 degree rule accurately. I.e. not placing my character directly against the wall so it becomes virtually impossible to carry out an over the shoulder shot. Exhibit A:  But rather allowing plenty of access to the characters blind spots to get the best angles for different shots and therefore different meanings and impacts...

Evaluation-Marking

1) Well written. Some good points about conventions. Good on introduction of character. Not sure about mix of shot types point 2) Good stuff on the white male  and demonisation of mental illness. Women as victims? 3) ' freedom with the control of the films running' I think this is a good point but it needed a little more explanation 4 ' cultural capital of audiences'??? Again a good point I think but you've over-complicated. 5) Some evidence of an understanding of marketing but more explanation would have been better. 6) Fairly basic points but covered all 7) A good post made much better with the addition of a director's commentary. The binary opposites of your two pieces...weirdo. Level 3 12–15 marks  • Proficient skill in the use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.  • Proficient understanding of issues around audience, institution, technology, representation, forms and conventions in relation to production.  • Proficient ability to refer...

Research and Planning- Marking

Kate's mood board work was not exactly what I had in mind yet still showed remarkable insight on occasions. The still images were used as the starting point of several analytical pieces which could be excellent (the pier) but over-complicated in places too (her comments on neon lighting in Drive). Kate's post on title sequences seems to chart the evolution of her idea rather than demonstrating a knowledge of the variety of title sequences and an understanding of their effects. Her entry on David Fincher is frustrating in that, although some truly insightful points are made, they are often buried amongst points that lack any relevance or don't make sense. The fourth slide of Kate's American Psycho analysis is an example of a good point almost lost due to over-complication. Kate's post on year 13 advice demonstrated a thorough approach to preparation for this task and her youtube clip on experiments with lighting demonstrate an incredible dedication and attention ...