Skip to main content

Marking other students work

Image
By

'Missing' - Level 3.

Is the material appropriate to the target audience?
8/10, uncomfortable footage for an uncomfortable horror sequence.


Are the titles conventional/appropriate?
6/10 dull and unclear, not overly visible to the eye, slightly half-hearted.


Sound, images and technical editing.
10/10 Excellent use music stings and pleonastic sounds.


Camera work, framing, variation of shots and mise en scene.
7/10 shaky at times, but a nice use of quadratics and relatively in frame.


Editing for meaningful effect, transitions and effects.
7/10 good continuity editing and match on action, nice dark tonality obviously finished in post-production.

Overall feel.
7/10, felt too much like a short film/trailer with use of flashbacks and irrelevant backstory squeezed into two minute sequence, just create strong enigma.



'Hemlock'- Level 4

Is the material appropriate to the target audience?
10/10, very tense and endearing to watch.


Are the titles conventional/appropriate?
10/10 beautiful font and effective use of typography. Credits are clear and soft to look at, adding to the atmosphere


Sound, images and technical editing.
10/10 Excellent use of classical music score and subtle yet effective editing.


Camera work, framing, variation of shots and mise en scene.
9/10 perfectly still, excellent use of quadratics. However, only relatively in frame at times.


Editing for meaningful effect, transitions and effects.
10/10 good continuity editing and match on action, nice blue tonality obviously finished in post-production. Subtle transitions are very effective.

Overall feel.
10/10, very atmospheric and effective film opening. Cinematography is aesthetically pleasing and its content is intensely enigmatic. Credits are placed effectively.


'The Bigger Picture' - Level 3

Is the material appropriate to the target audience?
8/10, teenage lifestyle iconography to promote relations to young people, its target audience.


Are the titles conventional/appropriate?
6/10 dull and unclear, not overly visible to the eye.


Sound, images and technical editing.
7/10 effective music soundtrack, pleonastic sounds such as the mouse clicking were edited in poorly. The clips were not muted before music was added in, meaning muffling of clothes and wind gusts are still audible.


Camera work, framing, variation of shots and mise en scene.
9/10 almost all completely shot on a tripod. Top of the characters head is cut off at times but otherwise well shot with a variety of angles and close ups.


Editing for meaningful effect, transitions and effects.
5/10 tacky edits, transitions and filters. Alas, their evaluation makes a compelling argument in defence of each ones usage.

Overall feel.
7/10, over usage of flashbacks and effects gave it a 'short film' vibe.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evaluation Seven: Progression

By
Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to full product? Planning. My preliminary task was painfully unplanned, and it was blatantly obvious. I'm a perfectionist, and it killed me to submit that video under my name. But my poor time management forced it through and I have no-one but myself to blame.  Besides learning to understand the importance of time management and how extensive planning aids projects significantly; I learnt a number of cinematic skills in progression from my preliminary- how to reduce white noise and background sound, how to enhance lighting features, how to follow the 180 degree rule accurately. I.e. not placing my character directly against the wall so it becomes virtually impossible to carry out an over the shoulder shot. Exhibit A:  But rather allowing plenty of access to the characters blind spots to get the best angles for different shots and therefore different meanings and impacts...
Post a Comment
Read more

Evaluation-Marking

By
1) Well written. Some good points about conventions. Good on introduction of character. Not sure about mix of shot types point 2) Good stuff on the white male  and demonisation of mental illness. Women as victims? 3) ' freedom with the control of the films running' I think this is a good point but it needed a little more explanation 4 ' cultural capital of audiences'??? Again a good point I think but you've over-complicated. 5) Some evidence of an understanding of marketing but more explanation would have been better. 6) Fairly basic points but covered all 7) A good post made much better with the addition of a director's commentary. The binary opposites of your two pieces...weirdo. Level 3 12–15 marks  • Proficient skill in the use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.  • Proficient understanding of issues around audience, institution, technology, representation, forms and conventions in relation to production.  • Proficient ability to refer...
Post a Comment
Read more

Research and Planning- Marking

By
Kate's mood board work was not exactly what I had in mind yet still showed remarkable insight on occasions. The still images were used as the starting point of several analytical pieces which could be excellent (the pier) but over-complicated in places too (her comments on neon lighting in Drive). Kate's post on title sequences seems to chart the evolution of her idea rather than demonstrating a knowledge of the variety of title sequences and an understanding of their effects. Her entry on David Fincher is frustrating in that, although some truly insightful points are made, they are often buried amongst points that lack any relevance or don't make sense. The fourth slide of Kate's American Psycho analysis is an example of a good point almost lost due to over-complication. Kate's post on year 13 advice demonstrated a thorough approach to preparation for this task and her youtube clip on experiments with lighting demonstrate an incredible dedication and attention ...
Post a Comment
Read more